Conceding and Refuting a Counter-Argument

Some argue that remote work reduces collaboration. However, this overlooks the range of digital tools now available.

Notice

  • Some argue that remote work reduces collaboration. However, this overlooks the range of digital tools now available.
  • Critics claim the policy is too costly. Yet the long-term savings far outweigh the initial investment.
  • It could be argued that the risks are too high. Even so, the potential benefits justify the effort.
  • Admittedly, the transition will not be easy. Nevertheless, it remains the right course of action.

Rule

A sophisticated argument acknowledges (concedes) the strongest opposing view before refuting it — this is far more persuasive than ignoring counter-arguments entirely, because it shows the writer has genuinely considered the issue. Structure: concession (some argue…/admittedly…) + refutation (however/yet/even so/nevertheless + counter-reasoning).

Practice

  1. Write a concession for: ‘Working from home improves productivity.’
    Answer: Admittedly, working from home can lead to distractions for some employees.
  2. Write a refutation following that concession.
    Answer: Nevertheless, most studies show a net gain in productivity overall.
  3. Why is conceding a counter-argument persuasive, rather than weakening your case?
    Answer: It shows balanced, credible reasoning rather than one-sided argument, which builds trust with the reader.
  4. Combine into one concession-refutation sentence: ‘The plan has risks. The benefits are worth it.’
    Answer: While the plan has risks, the benefits are worth it.

Connect

Read persuasive texts to see concession and refutation in action.

Try Reading Quiz →

CEFR: Reading and Writing — understand and construct balanced, credible argumentation.

Azizul Hakim
Latest posts by Azizul Hakim (see all)

Printable worksheet (PDF) Pro

PreviousNext