The strongest arguments acknowledge the other side before responding to it.

Notice

  • Concession: “While it is true that remote work can reduce collaboration, …” “Granted, the cost is higher, but…”
  • Counter-argument / refutation: “…the benefits far outweigh this drawback.” “…this concern is overstated, because…”

Rule

Rule: concede-then-counter structures make an argument feel fair and considered rather than one-sided, which is far more persuasive to a critical audience. The pattern is: acknowledge a valid point on the other side, then explain why your position still holds.

Practice

  1. Complete the concession: “While it is true that the new system is more expensive, ___.”
    Answer: Example: “…it will save the company far more in the long run through increased efficiency.”
  2. Rewrite this one-sided claim to include a concession: “Remote work is always better than office work.”
    Answer: Example: “Granted, remote work can make spontaneous collaboration harder, but for most tasks it offers far more flexibility and focus.”
  3. Why is concede-then-counter more persuasive than simply ignoring the opposing view?
    Answer: It shows the speaker has considered other perspectives fairly, which builds credibility and makes the final position harder to dismiss.

Connect

Spot concession and counter-argument patterns in real texts with the Reading Quiz.

Try Reading Quiz →

CEFR: C2

Azizul Hakim
Latest posts by Azizul Hakim (see all)
PreviousNext